Reilly proposes ‘stimulus package’

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 - 12:56 AM


Student Body President Eli Reilly’s budget uses cuts to money set aside for student government travel to pay for the first “stimulus package” in the student government’s history.

The package, a $200,000 commitment split between the next two years which will be matched by money from the Office of Financial Aid, will create 50 new student jobs on campus if it is approved by the Associated Students of the University of Nevada Senate.

“ASUN’s never done anything like this before,” Reilly said. “We wanted to help students who may be having a hard time, and what better way to do that then give them a job?”

Under the program, called the Undergraduate Student Employment Stimulus Package (USESP), the Office of the Provost will decide which departments on campus get the student jobs. If chosen, the departments will pay 25 percent of the student’s salary while the stimulus program pays the other 75 percent, according to a draft of the agreement that would create USESP. The program is not need-based.

Providing jobs to people would better benefit students than a lot of the things ASUN does,” Juan Ramirez, a 19-year-old computer science major, said. “I do think you need a balance of things like this and recreational things, though.”

Senate Speaker Gracie Geremia said the program would help students find jobs on campus that might not exist if budget cuts are too high.

“I think (USESP) is definitely something ASUN should take a look at,” she said. “It’s a good thing to discuss.”

ASUN will receive an increase in its overall budget due to a rise in the student fee that pays for it. Despite the increase, the size of USESP coupled with the cost of continuing Campus Escort services after that program was cut from the Office of Student Services forced Reilly to decide on cuts to other programs to free up money.

The majority of the cuts are to travel funds for different departments under Reilly’s budget.

“Most of those we saw as nonessential to the core missions of the programs,” Reilly said. “There were a few exceptions, but for the most part we thought it was extra.”

The exceptions included the travel fund for the programming board, which Reilly said was essential to the job they do and was not reduced.

“Every year the programming board attends a regional conference that teaches them how to spend the money we give them, without it they wouldn’t do as good a job as they do,” Reilly said.

Earlier in the budgeting process, Reilly looked at the possibility of cutting money to Insight Magazine, forcing the publication online-only. The final budget, however, paid for Insight at slightly less than $4,000 less than last year. Appendices to the executive budget listed the cuts to many of the travel funds as how Insight’s budget was restored.

Reilly said the original plans to reduce Insight’s budget were changed when Reilly and other members of his cabinet found an inaccuracy in the executive branch’s wages that freed up money for the magazine.

“(Planning the budget) is a zero-sum game and it took a lot of work to get it right,” Reilly said.

Jay Balagna can be reached at jbalagna@nevadasagebrush.com.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Posted under: News

4 Responses to “Reilly proposes ‘stimulus package’”

Eric Thornley says: April 21st, 2009 at 9:05 am

Notice to the mods – So we allow personal attacks but not educated critiques of policies?

Anyways….

50 jobs is not a lot. What is this going to do besides take a big bite out of the ASUN budget? This seems more like a line-item accomplishment in case Reilly’s term fails.

National economies are obviously much different from a University Budget, nor does it show proper ways to deal with one. What exactly are we stimulating? The University has a no independent economy.

Why can’t they cut wasteful spending instead? Who really needs a 3,500 dollar escape while the average student is struggling with finances? If Eli really wanted to cut things “nonessential to the core missions” then start with some of the stuff that we dont need.

Report this comment

Lupus says: April 21st, 2009 at 11:10 am

I call BS. “Appendices to the executive budget listed the cuts to many of the travel funds as how Insight’s budget was restored.”

More likely is that Eli’s failure to properly fund the reserve account, as is required under ASUN’s own law, is what allowed “saving” Insight.

http://vislupiestgrex.blogspot.com/2009/04/see-president-can-ignore-rules-too.html

Report this comment

Wolfie says: April 21st, 2009 at 4:11 pm

Will this program be done legally?

http://vislupiestgrex.blogspot.com/2009/04/thats-quite-package.html

Report this comment

Mike says: April 22nd, 2009 at 12:45 am

This. Has to be. The stupidest thing I have ever heard.

This isn’t going to stimulate anything. It’s going to help some 0.4% of the undergraduate population by giving them make work jobs that nobody is willing to pay for by themselves?

According to this idea, if there are 8 of us working somewhere and our boss only thinks our work is worth somewhere around $8 an. hour, he’s only going to pay us around $8 an hour. But now, according to this, someone who’s productivity is only worth $2 gets to come in and earn the same amount of money as the rest of us. Is this fair? In fact, if the boss had enough to hire someone who’s productivity is actually $8, he can instead hire 4 people whose productivity is each $2. Well now there’s 12 people working at a combined productivity of around $72 an hour but now it costs $96 an hour.

Make no mistake about it, money is being lost. Now instead of everyone giving 100% to break even (in our example) they must give 133%!

There’s no real way the cost of this “stimulus package” can be recouped in the long run. It’ll benefit a few people right now (if that) and in two years will just cause greater and greater headaches (which of course the ASUN must step in and fix!).

Let us not forget Hazlitt’s famous Lesson:

“The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups. “

Report this comment


Share:
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • MySpace

Leave A Comment

Latest Comments

    • Open minded individual: Everyone has blown this way out of proportion... i...
    • Some guy: WOW! You guys must have worked really hard for ...
    • Elliot Malin: Well a big congratulations to the NEVADA Mining Te...
    • lol: Typical ASUN Senate behavior...
    • DB: I'm a bit lost on what this article is trying to d...
    • Zoe: You write very well and can paint a scene with you...
Comment
By submitting a comment, you agree to the Terms and Conditions stated here.