Chapel plans may defy Constitution

Monday, February 6, 2012 - 10:37 PM


Community and student religious leaders meet with interim university President Marc Johnson on Friday to discuss an interfaith chapel. Ben Miller/Nevada Sagebrush

Though the establishment of an interfaith chapel at the University of Nevada, Reno could violate the First Amendment, administrators agreed in principle Friday to begin looking for space for the project.

Such projects have run into controversy in the past when they blurred the lines between church and state, said Allen Lichtenstein, general counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada.

A multi-million dollar chapel at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo. drew criticism when opponents said the institution was forcing one particular belief on all its cadets.

“It absolutely pushed one particular religious viewpoint, not only to the exclusion of others but to the point where cadets were persecuted if they didn’t believe in that certain message,” Lichtenstein said. “That’s always a risk or a problem if government gets involved in religion.”

The prospective UNR chapel received international attention after the Associated Press picked up the story on Jan. 28, as well as various local news outlets.

Though many details of the project remain unclear, interim university President Marc Johnson said he believes designating a permanent location for the project would open the door for intercultural understanding based on religion.

“There’s so much religious strife in the world,” Johnson said. “It would be nice to train ambassadors for peace rather than people who don’t understand different religions here. So I think there’s a good educational mission here.”

Johnson said administrators are considering designating a space in the empty Getchell Library building for the chapel when it opens in several years. The building is in a long-term renovation process.

Lichtenstein said the status of the project in regards to the Constitution depends on many variables ranging from how inclusive it is to whether it receives funding from the university. Ultimately, he said it might be safer for the group to seek an off-campus or near-campus location.

Rajan Zed, a Hindu leader in Reno and Director of Interfaith Relations for the Nevada Clergy Association, said the patrons of the chapel would most likely raise any necessary funding themselves and would seek to provide clergy to accommodate any request as well as open the room for secular purposes.

President of the UNR chapter of the Women’s Federation for World Peace Sarah Canak, who first proposed the idea, said she views the chapel less as an issue of separation of church and state and more of a concern about freedom of religious expression.

“True freedom would be encouraging everyone to express themselves,” Canak said. “Instead of saying ‘Oh, well, we’re afraid that the state will not be able provide this for everyone, (so) we’re just not going to have it for anyone,’ we provide a space for people to do this.”

However, questions remain as to where the chapel will go. Director of the Joe Crowley Student Union Chuck Price said at a meeting with the Friends of the Interfaith Chapel on Friday that rooms in the union are in demand and are hard to set aside for consistent purposes.

Canak said she would like having a permanent location in an existing space. However, she would support a new structure being built to house the chapel.

It is also unclear how much money the project will need. Johnson said at the meeting that he would consider hiring security for the chapel to ensure the safety of its patrons. Members of the group agreed that they would like to have at least chairs and a bookshelf in the chapel. They said they were unsure of whether they would decorate it with various religious symbols.

“If you’ve ever been to a chapel inside a hospital or airport, there’s no religious insignia up on the walls because (they) really want to make sure it’s interfaith,” Canak said.

For now, Director of Diversity Initiatives Reginald Stewart said he will continue to meet with members of the group to discuss what their needs will be. That conversation will ultimately determine where the space is located and how it is run, he said.

Ben Miller can be reached at bmiller@nevadasagebrush.com.


Related Posts:


6 Responses to “Chapel plans may defy Constitution”

Elliot Malin says: February 7th, 2012 at 12:04 pm

Our of curiosity where does the basis of violation of the Constitution take place? I assume we are talking First Amendment.

I remember you being in the meeting, and don’t mean to offend at all. But by leaving it open to use by any religion does not defy the Constitution. This goes with the notion of celebrating Christmas in public grade schools. Or the Pledge of Allegiance.

I think your title really doesn’t do what the purpose of the room justice. And honestly, offends some people.

I agree that the campus community as a whole should probably come together and discuss it. But by attacking it as unconstitutional is a far stretch. UC-Berkeley has one and is building it’s own building, Ohio State has one, and these are major universities. Now why keep us in the dark when it could help propel our campus?

I suggest you look into your title a little more. Because like I said it’s a little offensive, and I do know the Sagebrush is trying to get away from statements that aren’t completely truthful.

Report this comment

Elliot Malin says: February 7th, 2012 at 3:42 pm

Sorry, Out* for the first word.

Report this comment

Eric Thornley says: February 7th, 2012 at 6:33 pm

Elliot,

Would you mind if Atheists/other secular students used the room to discuss scientific issues and what not? Just curious.

Report this comment

James J says: February 10th, 2012 at 5:31 pm

Erik,
I have no problem with atheists/non-secular students using the facility, so long as you remain respectful of other students and their beliefs. That’s what the goal of the proposed chapel is about of course. Practicing tolerance of other faiths.

Report this comment

Elliot Malin says: February 13th, 2012 at 11:45 am

Eric,

As one of the leaders of one of the religious groups on campus, no I do not have a problem with Atheists or secular groups using the facility as long as they are to be respectful to the other groups, and that goes the other way as well. I would expect all of the religious groups to be respectful of the Atheists and secular groups.

However, I still need to know where the base of the “violating the constitution” comes from?

If it is open to everyone which is what the plan is, then there is not basis for this title or saying it doesn’t belong on campus. If he really listened to the meeting it was to try and unite the campus and try to bring about an understanding of each other.

Thank you,
Elliot

Report this comment

Eric says: February 14th, 2012 at 12:15 am

What is your definition of being respectful? If it doesn’t cover secular students coming in and discussing non-religious things over a cup of a coffee or something, then I encourage you to re-think the definition of respectful.

Report this comment


Share:
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • MySpace

Leave A Comment

Latest Comments

Comment
By submitting a comment, you agree to the Terms and Conditions stated here.